Business and Law - short story Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Business and Law - short story - Case Study moralApart from this she also had to undergo mental stress as she had wooly her prestige.Sarah suffered physical injuries and mental throe because she got a t-shirt from a sale conducted by Cameron at her hotel. Just because she wore the t-shirt which had toxic material, Sarah suffered rashes on the whole(a) over her body and she was admitted to the hospital. She had to spend almost 6 weeks at the hospital. Finally when she was better the rashes left scars all over her body due to which she could not negotiate a movie deal with a major(ip) movie studio.The manufacturer has to use reasonable skill and care in the circumstances (ie. if the possible wounding is very serious then the manufacturer will have a heavier handicraft, if the chance of injury is remote, the duty will be greater than if the chance of injury has a greater probability).When the facts indicate some omission (eg. a snail in a bottle), the consumer does not have to rise up how the manufacturer was negligent. The manufacturer has to prove that they did meet the standard of care.Based on the above Sarah has every honorable to take action against Cameron. She stand sue Cameron in the court of constabulary. Sarahs physical injuries caused by wearing the t-shirt resulted in her cancellation of a major movie contract. This was only because of the negligence on the part of Cameron who sold the t-shirt. Sarah also has the right to bring for frantic distress. The law says that if ablaze distress causes physical injury in this case (Sarahs skin rashes) then the requireant who suffered emotional distress can make a claim.3. Issues of the caseThe gasfitter knowingly did damage to the pipeline of the hotel.Actionsurface-to-air missile can take legal action against the gasfitter. He can sue the gasfitter in the court of law and can also claim damages for negligence caused by him. Sam due to the negligence of the gasfitter had lost around $80,000 beca use it took 8 days to start the business after the gasfitter had tampered with his gasoline. 5. Sam the hotel owner had filed a claim for damages with her insurance company. In this case the insurance company has every right to deny her claim because it is evident that Sam has been inviting trouble from the whale rights activists Dignity for Whales. She went against the law by selling whale meat.Sam had renew the insurance policy and there was a contract with him and the insurance company. The insurance company cannot deny the claim. exclusively since Sam had invited the damages she has no right to claim.With regard to the second attack, from the problem it is not clear as to why his hotel was attacked for the second time. Probably if she had carried on to serve whale meat then she has no right to claim. But if Sam had not continued serving whale meat then he has a right to claim from the insurance company.6.Issues of the caseCameron suffered loss of her assembly line due to fire . She had lost 95% of her stock but the insurance company paid her 100%. The issue is that whether Cameron can keep the sale