The Role of Diplomat and Functions

The agency of Diplomat and FunctionsINTRODUCTIONCommunication and engineering has been the driving force of a new world order of globalization affecting argonas of the world-wide arranging bringing ab forth authoritative developings and changes that affects put incraft and the roles of the professionals that carries out this functions for the state.The role of a diplomatist has a tremendous impact on all overseas contrive _or_ strategy of government decision which consequently finds expression by certain means such(prenominal) as confabulation and technology, with the primary motive of using cultivation and mental represendation as a zippy instrument of kickshaw. Diplomacy at that placefore aro go for be said to be defined as the professional precaution of relations across reign (Melissen, 1999, p.1).Over clock time the product in conversation and technology has had study(ip) effect on how diplomats drive out their functions and the major roles they play b ringing most certain changes from the fragility of the old-fashioned point in times to the pre move day new diplomacy. However, in examining how the changes in communication and technology has affected the role of the in advance(p) diplomat this essay is going to go steady the historical context of diplomaticalal communication, the roles of the forward- looking diplomat, the impact of communication and technology in diplomacy, how certain changes have affected the roles of the upstart day diplomat and in that locationby concluding with certain solutions that would improve the negative effects of communication and technology on the roles of the modern diplomat.THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF DIPLOMATIC COMMUNICATION. diplomatic communications in the past was fundamentally done by non technical means through the physical exercise of real obscure methods such as signs, wooden tablets and the use of messengers. jibe to Melissen the first record of a diplomatic communication was in form of a letter written on a stone which was to be delivered by a messenger who walked 2000 kilometers to run his roles.(1999,p.3). The use of the messenger symbolized agency of the country in communicating certain issues of foreign policy to the other country making sure that both schooling was confidential and delivered to the right person with congeries understanding of its content. During this period the method of delivering letters was one of the most effective ways to carry out diplomatic relations with the messenger as the professional who has the correcttual(prenominal) role of making sure the purpose of the type is achieved and to a fault prudent for giving his home government feedback on his diplomatic mission. The messenger served as a form of sovereign equality amidst the countries and was existence sent because of certain qualities which he possessed and as the countrys confidant. (Melissen 1999,p.4)Also elites in the society and men of very high reputat ions experienced in states affairs were also given roles of negotiating agreements on behalf of their state government. (Leguey-Feilleux 2009, p.25)The messengers served at different levels of state postings for a period of time reporting and collating many conversations with the king, palace decreeds and other foreign diplomats (Melissen 1999, p.4). They basically helped in carrying out major functions that promoted the several achievements of their government.The messengers also enmeshed in several strategic activities such as forming alliances with neighboring countries and intelligence proceeds collation of political issues. (Melissen 1999, p.5). They were also used to foster trade negotiations in the midst of counties on behalf of their home countries.These messengers also had to be occupier abroad to continuously perform duties because traveling was very dangerous and often difficult. (Leguey-Feilleux 2009, p.24). At this time at that place were no good road net induc es or viable transportation establishment in other words messengers traveled very languish distances to perform roles in very unsafe conditions. then Leguey-Feilleux emphasizes on the event that, these messengers were been used as a writer of contact between their countries and their neighbors contend roles of intermediation and were also used to concur preparation for court visits, served as agents on temporary and adhoc missions, engaged in crucial debates with other representatives over their governments policies and engaged in information collection of both internal and out-of-door relations (Leguey-Feilleux 2009, p.31-36)Consequently diplomats also submitted protest, presented legal claims for review, made proposals, represented at social functions and tolerated diversity of civilizations (Melissen 1999, p.9)There was also the exchange of objects, drawings and gifts that cl primal express out the diplomatic intentions of the diplomats and the human body of relations hip they want to maintain. (Bianca, 2009, No 1). disdain all these roles clearly stated there were some limitations that brought about the aim for an utility on the roles of the diplomat (messenger). Challenges such as animosity in a mission and bad behavior altered communications between states and made some representatives unfriendly with each other. (Eban, 1998, p.27).Governments were also in doubts of the representatives they sent on missions in other words they were not given total authority on certain issues of international politics considerably there was the problem of cultural and language differences which sometimes made missions not so productive and some times the messengers were captured for ransom.(Leguey-Feilleux,2009,p36-40).But with time things began to change particularly as country moved from one political era to some other and with the cosmos of improvised means of communication and the lingering evidence of interdependence which is today kn hold as globaliz ation coupled with the conscious growth of technology.Melissen confirms this by emphasizing on the growth of civilization as favourable diplomatic practice (1999, p.7).According to Leguey-feilleux, the fourteen and the fifteenth deoxycytidine monophosphate improvement on communications and technology intensified diplomatic practices and sharpened the roles of a diplomat marking the renaissance period the beginning of modern diplomacy which brought about signifi bottomlandt diplomatic innovations. (2009, p.37)During this period slight changes were made to make the roles of the diplomat more(prenominal) efficient and specific. As regards this there were more diplomatic missions established abroad giving the instance of the first realistic resident embassy in Italy (Melissen1999, p.13)New forms of activities arrived government started using couriers, ciphers, codes, telegrams, pomps and ceremonies were seen as being vital but traveling still remained difficult. (Leguey-feilleux, 20 09, p. 42)In addition the nineteenth atomic number 6 brought an improvement to the roles of diplomat with the creation of multilateral diplomacy where by diplomats had a larger playing ground to perform their roles. (Leguey-Feilleux, 2009, p 43).THE ROLES OF THE MODERN DIPLOMAT. bit by bit with the event of the twentieth century the roles of the modern diplomat increased in different dimensions and moved considerably to a global level with provable changes in communication and a severe impact from technology.According to the capital of Austria Convention some of these roles are as followsThe representation of state socially, politically and ceremonially in other countries.The protection of states interest, overseas nationals and states commercial activities.Negotiations on behalf of government and signing of agreements. reading gathering of states activities externally, and in missionary cases, gathering information from force countries.The promotion of cordial and friendly rela tions in the international system. (Encyclopedia Britannica,2009, No.164602)Other major functions are as followswhich finds expression in political activities, trade activities and consular activities. This trade activities as to do with knowing about commercial developments, period the consular deals with the major local activities of its host country and political activities are majorly maintaining good political relationships abroad. (Eban 1998, p.33-39)Consequently the roles of the modern diplomat can extend to his family basically on the social diorama and morals of good behavior. According to Wood, the roles of a diplomat has a form of professional identity on their wives and family, giving the manikin of the wife of a Mexican diplomat who contributed to her husbands roles by writing a book on diplomatic identity.(2004,volume 25)Diplomats also play major roles such as being among a committee to draft a charter giving the slip of Lord Gladwyn a British diplomat who took pa rt in drafting the United Nations Charter. (Stout, 1996, p.2)Diplomats also create relationships and maintain good level of communication between external affairs and internal structures.(Watkins, 2008, No1).THE IMPACT OF COMMUNICATION AND engineering AND ITS EFFECT ON THE ROLES OF THE MODERN DIPLOMAT.Globalization is the major catalyst of the cabbage of change that has blown into the kit and caboodle of the modern diplomat. Starting from the consular diplomat to the political and all other areas, the issues of global interdependence and its continuation through technological means of communication as left little for the diplomat to function on but in no doubt there are some major achievements as a result of this change.Consequently technology as brought about faster means of carrying out diplomatic statecraft functions which can be seen according to Melissen through the invention of devices such as telephone, technological transportation systems, telecommunications and the inter net. (1999, p.171)As a result of this diplomats can do their works faster without fear of danger especially while traveling, there are better methods of communicating with friendly relations without walk long distances, there are more graphical technological instruments that describes tangled economic and political situations that helps the diplomat to be effective in his work and also help the government of the day to whom he reports to. According to Melissen.The creation of the rail way transportation gave the diplomats a very good acuity in performing their functions on land, also with the creation of electric telegraph and fax machines which has enabled faster communication between diplomatic relations.(1999,p.171)Leguey_feilleux also describes major technological innovations as substantially contributing to the evolving of new diplomatic methods that shapes the roles of the modern diplomat at the level of communication (2009, p.46).The impact of the media in elevation the roles of the modern diplomat are not underestimated as well, giving information and sometimes helps in relaying diplomatic intentions to the creation creating a from of feedback process from the public to the government.The creation and the application of IT (information Technology) is no exception to the fostering of modern diplomatic roles with the increasing performance of hardware and software for information gathering (Melissen, 1999, p.171).With this development information is easily accessible and can be codified there by serving as a source of security for key documentations and intelligence finding.This would practically make the diplomat work more efficiently to accomplish missions. flavour closely all this impact on modern diplomatic roles finds expression in digitalization bringing new counselling tools, low cost on access to information and integrated resources of information. (Melissen, 1999, p.171)The use of media especially as regards public diplomacy has fostere d the role of the diplomat in breaking down cultural barriers between its policy officers and the specified public. (Gilboa,2000,No. 3)This thereby creates a political atmosphere for better functioning.Despite all this major impact of communication and technology, there has been major changes that as served to displace the roles of the modern diplomat. Melissen confirms this by saying that, the position of a diplomat is related to the sovereignty of a state which as a result of globalization as thrown into questions the viability of a state to manage social, economic and political affairs.(1999, p.173)Looking closely as well, the creation of international organizations, such as ILO (international campaign organization), United Nations and Commonwealth undertake certain functions diplomats carry out because of the states membership and inability to solve certain problems. (Leguey- Feilleux, 2009, p.45).Economic initiatives such as the Bretoonwoods system and GATT were majorly done out of the context of the roles of the diplomat, it was basically done and concluded by international organizational members (Leguey- Feilleux, 2009, p.45).Without any doubt, the use of telephones, media and satellite communication has weakened diplomatic representatives (Melissen, 1999, p.171)Heads of states now conclude on foreign relations via telephones without the representation of the diplomat and also hold conference meetings with other heads of state via moving-picture show calls and internet conferencing. This gives the diplomat little to do because its role on representation is being replaced with some form of technological breakthrough.Also some international organizations perform major diplomatic assignments on their own by move special officers on special missions, interfering in external remainder thereby altering the roles of the diplomat (Leguey-feilleux 2009, p.46)Further more there is the emergence of transnational actors whom as a result of technology have sup porters round the world, yielding into political power itself without any form of representation. (Leguey-Feilleux 2009, p.46) For example looking at the connections between elites of a society with other elites outside its countries who basically have business relationships with each other and make decisions that affect states policies without official representative of the state.Consequently also the relationships between diplomats and their government is changing, when there are mis sentimentions on issues states actors just use the most effective technology to communicate.(Leguey-feilleux,2009,p.86) more than so giving the fact that the concept of power as changed in the international system, there is no more clear distinction of the concept of diplomacy. (Melissen.1999, p.clxxv). This simply refers to the obvious that major international organizations mediate the act of diplomacy on their own especially when it comes to war situations or cessationkeeping without completely i nvolving diplomats but involving state actors at some point.More over the source of information is regarded to be more powerful than even territory and tangible resources. (Melissen 1999, p.175)According to Nye and Owen in this fast growth of an international political system aided by technology, information is seen as the ultimate weapon of state relations (Nye and Owen cited in Melissen, 1999, p.175). As a result of this states actors on their own hirer special officers to look into certain issues and bring viable information rather than leaving it to the diplomats.Nye and Owen further argue that the importance of technology, education and institutional flexibility is increasing and its changing the roles of foreign policy actors and also their governments in managing and promoting national interest.(Nye and Owen cited in Melissen 1999,p.175).the understanding this gives is that supranational organizations are becoming more powerful in the international system which affects state craft and consequently affects the works of the technocrats under its administration not making them effective as they use to be.Information technology is gradually making spatial concept opposed looking at the use of satellite in space to bring down first hand information which basically alters a diplomats role in gathering information (Melissen 1999, p.176). This basically implies that others especially the media already have the identical information as well and can deliver the information even before the diplomat does.Another major effect of technology is the Media. According to Leguey-feilleux, The CNN factor makes information instantly known around the world which mounts insistence on state to find solutions in time which consequently gives diplomats very short time to deliberate, strategize and respond to issues. (2009, p.87).Eban in his book calls this The Intrusive Media (1998, p.75). The media is basically seen as an obstruction often which basically slows diplomatic d uties and bring about inadequate decision making. But Eban points out to the fact that no takings the situation of the media the diplomat still as to put in to musing his partner and his own public opinion.(1998,p.75)CONCLUSIONConsequently the many changes in communication and technology has its major positives sides using the telephone as an example which can be used to carryout roles especially in warring situations without being in physical danger of any kind. Giving the example of the mediation by telephone in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict which brought the signing of the Oslo peace process between the two countries in 1995 (Leguey-Feilleux, 2009, p. 89). Technology has also helped to facilitate the work of diplomatic intelligence with the creation of electronic spying, network power, early warning and crises management and cyber security.(Leguey-Feilleux,2009,p.92-94)Therefore the role of a modern diplomat can basically be managed with respective cooperation from the state actors, civil service and the Foreign Service itself. With each understanding the underlying factors of its functions without clashes of any kind as regards communication, information and technology.BIBLIOGRAPHYLeguey-Feilleux, J.(2009),The Dynamics of Diplomacy (Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.).Eban, A. (1998), Diplomacy for the Next speed of light (Yale University).Melissen, J. (1999), Innovation in Diplomatic Practice (Macmillan Press Ltd.)Wood, M. (2004), A Diplomats married woman in Mexico Creating Professional, political and National Identities in the Early Twentieth century A Journal of Women Studies Volume 25.Stout, D. (1996), Lord Gladwyn, British Diplomat, U.N Leader (News) (Obituary) unremarkable News Los Angeles CA,October 27.,pp.2.Gilboa, E. (2000), Media coverage of multinational Negotiation A taxonomy of levels and effects International Negotiation Journal, Volume 5, NO.3Bianca, C. (2009) Digging for Antiquities with DiplomatsGisbet Cuper (1644-1716) and His Social Capital Republic of letter A Journal for the study of knowledge, politics and the arts Volume 1, No.1Watkins J. (2008), Toward a New Diplomatic History Journal of Medieval and Early modernistic Studies Volume 38, No.1.Encyclopedia Britannica, (2009). Diplomacy, Retrieved 07/01/10, from Encyclopedia Britannica online. Http//www.britannica.com/EB checked/topic/164602/Diplomacy.Melissen, J.(2009), Americas Information Edge in S. Nye and W.A. Owen, Innovation in Diplomatic practice. (Macmillan Press Ltd),PP. 175